Who changes what, how a change reaches a live site, and the guardrails that stop a small edit becoming a big problem.
| Change | Where it happens | Who |
|---|---|---|
| Wording on one clinic's page opening hours, an offer, a paragraph | That clinic's repository, in its content files | Marketing team, or an agent on request |
| Design or layout a new section, a fix to how pages look | The template, once. It then reaches every clinic as a pull request | Amy, or an agent |
| Text-level SEO requests titles, headings, keywords | Raised as a request, applied in the clinic's content files | SEO provider requests, we apply |
A pull request is simply a proposed change with a description, which someone reads before it goes live. It also gives us a record of why every change was made, and a one-click way back if a change turns out wrong.
A design change is made once and offered to every clinic. It never arrives unannounced.
If a page is broken, the build fails and nothing ships.
Fails until every address from the old site is either rebuilt or redirected.
Fails if a page is still another clinic's copy with the names swapped.
No superlatives, no invented numbers, no other clinic's details left behind.
The review board on this site is where page-by-page feedback happens, instead of a Word document going back and forth. Sign in with your name and the shared team password, set a page's status as you review it, and leave notes on the page itself. Everyone sees the same list, and the notes stay attached to the page they belong to.
Each site's rankings are tracked daily, from the clinic's own suburb, because local results depend on where the searcher is. We keep a baseline of where the old site ranked before the move, so the effect of the migration can be measured rather than guessed.
After launch we watch for four to eight weeks with the old site still available as a fallback. A dip in the first fortnight is normal; what matters is the trend and whether any page that used to rank has dropped out.